A
New Trilogy of Church Giving
"The
Lord of the Things"
By Tracy S. Ebarb, Executive
Vice President
Dallas
With
apologies to J.R.R. Tolkien, I’m convinced
there is a “trilogy,” of sorts,
facing the contemporary Church when it comes
to budgeting, development and fundraising.
A working title like “The
Lord of the Things” seems appropriate
for the new epic that is being written in
the lives of many church-going Americans.
It’s not that the average church-member
in the 21st Century is not giving, it’s
just that they’re not giving to their
“home church” on the level of
the previous generation.
This is not a story that
has just broken. In fact, we’ve seen
this coming for several years as we’ve
watched the “greatest generation”
– the generation of tithers –
decrease in numbers. The generations that
have replaced them have widely varying interests
that guide their charitable giving, and
a broad set of criteria they use in determining
their level of support for the causes they
do choose.
In an effort to get a handle
on some of the challenges that churches
are facing in the areas of lifestyle stewardship,
budgeting, giving and capital fundraising,
see if this “trilogy” rings
true in your experience:
Part 1 of the
Trilogy: The Fellowship of Bling Bling
While we seem to have made
it past the era of finding our identity
only through our work, the prevailing culture
in the average American church is one that
prizes success in all its forms. The rise
of Christian/spiritual self-help workshops,
books, seminars and even diet/exercise programs
is astounding. While the goal of better
stewardship is often included in some of
these programs and books, whether by cause
or effect, the average church member is
defining spiritual maturity or success in
materialistic ways. Consider the outward
evidence of this:
- Nice homes
- Nice cars
- Cell phones
- Vacations
There seems to be an unofficial
organization – or “Fellowship”
– of those of us with the appropriate
“things.” You see, we don’t
see ourselves as materialistic, and maybe
we’re not. We’re just taking
advantage of the conveniences of today’s
world. This “fellowship” appreciates
and properly uses all that this world offers
in the way of resources and opportunities,
and is quite willing to pay the required
fee.
For example, some would
argue that providing a cell phone for my
15-year-old son is a bit extravagant. I
however, would argue that with my travel
schedule it is a necessity to keep in contact,
and maintain good communication. Most of
us are very careful not to judge others
based on how we perceive they spend their
money, because we certainly don’t
want anyone judging us. We like being a
part of this “Fellowship of Bling
Bling.” And this is not going to change!
Part 2 of the Trilogy:
The Two Powers
In the Old Testament book
of Nehemiah, the title character is assailed
verbally and threatened physically by two
enemies as he tries to rally the ‘lay
people’ to restore, build, and grow.
The 21st Century church is challenged by
two key “powers,” as well. These
“Two Powers” square off in direct
competition for the limited dollars that
are available for charitable causes. It
is notable that overall giving to charitable
causes has risen slightly in recent weeks.
However, the pie is being cut into more
slices and the Church’s slice is not
getting larger.
The “Two Powers”
are: Convenience Spending and Leisure Spending
Never in the history of
the Church has it faced such formidable
competition for dollars. Previous generations
were very content to take limited vacations
and always considered time off work as a
luxury. Today’s sentiment is more
entitlement-based: “I deserve time
off. I am going to enjoy it and I may even
splurge a bit!”
Consider the attitude of
the near-extinct “loyalty tither:”
“I give whether
I’m there or not. Just because I’ve
got to be out of town doesn’t mean
that the Church’s needs are any less.
If I can’t be there, I’ll drop
it off or mail it in.”
Contrast that attitude
to the attitude of many regular church attendees
in 2005:
“When I (my family)
need(s) to get away for a weekend, I/we
consider that good for our spiritual health.
‘Retreating’ is money well spent.
I/we always come back refreshed and more
ready to ‘serve’ as a result
of going away.”
Please understand that
I’m not arguing whether or not that’s
true. It doesn’t really matter. The
reality is that leisure spending is greater
than ever before in our nation’s history
– and growing. Not only that, convenience
spending is growing exponentially! Time
is the currency of the new millennium, and
we will gladly pay the price to have more
time, or manage it better.
This is not going
to change!
It may be that churches
need to provide opportunities to capture
some of the convenience and leisure dollars.
In today’s church,
we don’t give our perfect attendance
awards any longer. In fact, very few members
are in attendance every Sunday. When they’re
not at church on Sunday, guess where they
are? They’re out spending MONEY! Most
people today have a sort of “pay-as-you-go”
mentality. Not only that, the average family
in church today will spend twice as much
on vacations this year than they will give
in offerings to the church!
Part 3 of the Trilogy:
The Return of Cha-Ching
You may be saying, “All
that is very interesting, but how do we
effectively deal with it?”
That is the key question
facing church leaders who are grappling
with increasing needs and dwindling resources.
First, we have to answer some penetrating
questions:
1. Whatever happened
to “tithing?” Or, asked
another way: “Does our Church teach
giving as a duty? A “spiritual discipline?”
Many churches today have a very difficult
time talking about “giving”
or money issues. In fact, this has been
the case for quite some time. As a result,
most youth and children in church are poorly
educated in the area of “stewardship.”
We would do well to address
this as soon as possible. The reality is:
we do reap what we sow. Spiritual principles
of giving and receiving are like gravity:
They work every time.
2. What really
motivates people to give? Today’s
average church member is far less likely
than previous generations to give financial
support out of a sense of loyalty to the
Church, or out of a sense of duty. The member
is, however, motivated by success: Programs
and ministries that have proven effective
in the past, or that promise results in
the near future. In other words, creative
programming that inspires and challenges
today’s member to give of their time,
talent … and treasure. Accept the
challenge to develop Mission and Ministry
for your church that do not allow the “time
- talent - treasure” to become an
either/or, multiple-choice question.
3. How important
is “success” in church budgeting?
Far too many churches just “pass
the budget and hope for the best.”
Most ministers are trained professionals
who are very capable of designing an annual
“business plan” for the church
to follow. “New-Millennium Givers”
are more prone to support success in church
programming than they are to rescue struggling
ministries. Budgets should be written to
reflect the Ministry Plan of the church
leadership and should be evaluated accordingly
throughout the year. Years ago as a Youth
Minister, I requested an increase of more
than 400 percent in my Youth Ministry budget.
I accompanied that request with a detailed
plan of the ministry events, expected attendance
and hoped-for results. Not all of those
events went as planned. Some were winners,
and some were losers. However, simply because
I had a plan, and evaluated that plan every
year, I continued to ask for and receive
increased support for my youth budget for
the duration of my service.
4. Who makes the “giving”
decision in the average household? This
may bite a little deep, but it is a critical
question. In most households, financial
support for the church is not important
enough to warrant everyone in the household’s
input. It is an arbitrary decision made
by one family member! That’s fine
if you’re single, but otherwise each
person should be aware of and involved in
the spiritual decision to give.
So What’s
the Final Chapter?
In terms of financial support
for the church and its ministries, I don’t
think the question is one of resources,
but of communication and authenticity. We
must communicate what we are doing with
the gifts we’ve been given, and what
we plan to do with the gifts we’re
asking for. And, we must model authenticity
in our practice of stewardship principles,
both as individuals, and as institutions.
It might not be so bad if we were all truly
“Lord of the Things” in our
lives. Let’s just make sure that the
“things” don’t become
the “Lord” of us.
For more information
on how your Church can “Budget for
Success,” contact Tracy S. Ebarb at
1-800-222-9233.